Re: Konica processing

["Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>]

On 10 Aug 96 at 13:34, Eduardo Ayrosa wrote:

> As I said in the first message, the negatives look great, and the prints look better. 
> I used the film in Scotland, at the top of Wallace's monument, to photograph the 
> landscape. As it was a somewhat hazy day I decided to try this IR film, and the 
> results were terrific. Please notice that, contrary to the common procedures I loaded 
> the film in normal light conditions and set the meter to 100 ASA, and not at 12 
> according to Konica.

Lets see: 
32 ASA without filter (Konica sheet)
onboard meters are insensitive for red, most require +1
makes 64 ASA

By putting your camera on 100 ASA, you are only 2/3 stop off my
calculation. I'd call that close....8-))
Note that the 12 ASA for red is ment for a hand held
meter, or metering *without* filter....

Check how many stops light loss your camera meter reads with a red 
filter....if it is more than 3 stops, my calculation holds even 
better....;-))

--
Bye,

       _/      _/       _/_/_/_/_/       _/_/_/_/_/
     _/  _/  _/               _/       _/  _/  _/
     _/  _/ illem    _/     _/ an    _/  _/  _/ arkerink
                     _/_/_/  


The difference 
between men and boys
is the price of their toys

<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]

------------------------------

End of INFRARED-PHOTOGRAPHY Digest 28
*************************************