Re: Weddings & IR flash

[boblong@xxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Long)]

On Sun, 18 Aug 1996 14:34:06 +0100, Willem-Jan Markerink wrote:

|The Schwarzschildt effect might be responsible for more 
|inconsistencies than the flash itself....

In some of its emulsions Kodak (at least; I assume other makers do
too) makes a clear distinction between versions formulated for
relatively long exposures and those formulated for short ones.  Surely
IR emulsions must be predicated on long exposures (particularly the
Konica), because that's they way they are normally used.  I doubt the
producers would even give this assumption a second thought.

See what a vast terra incognita you've opened up with your use of
flash?  Perhaps you will be known to future generations as the Vasco
da Gama or the Jacques Cartier of IR flash photography.  Maybe even
the Christopher Columbus--but who needs that sort of controversy!

------------------------------

Topic No. 7