Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Report on Most recent tests, IR for Weddings...
- From: klycea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Adam-HALPID Klyce)
- Subject: Report on Most recent tests, IR for Weddings...
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 12:45:56 -0700
Hi all,
I shot two rolls of Kodak HIE and one of IE in Yosemite
National Park about three weeks ago. Haven't gotten the IE
back from Rocky Mountain yet, but I had the HIE processed at
a place called The Photo Lab, in Berkeley, California.
The HIE rolls were tests, for me, of my B+W filters. I tried
to make the tests something that I could use to judge a
few things but I ran into a few problems.
One - as I have mentioned earlier in this list, I have had to
load and unload HIE in the presence of light. I tried to
shield the rolls as much as possible while doing this, but
the first exposures of each roll were fogged.
The filters I were testing included, B+W 092, 093 and 094. I
may have my numbers wrong but they were a deep red, very very
deep red and opaque.
For exposure, I used the B+W recomendations, which I posted
before I went on the trip, and they worked! Of course, results
always vary but I shot early in the morning and in the evening,
trying to capitalize on the many benefits of shooting at those
times of day - including increased IR.
The base film speeds I used to meter were:
Deep red filter - ISO 50. I set the meter in my Nikon N90s
at 50 and metered the scene using the Matrix metering, then I
manually set the exposure the Matrix metering gave me and
put the filter over the lens. I bracketing -2,-1, 0 , +1 , +2
five exposures per scene/per filter.
For the very very deep red filter I used a base ISO of 20,
and for the opaque filter an ISO of 10.
All in all, I prefer the shots made with the red and very deep
red filters to those made with the opaque. I will have to try
more tests, of course, to see if I get similar results again.
Which brings me to the rest of this already lenghty post;
I am shooting a wedding in two and half weeks and I think I
will try and rent another N90s to use for IR. I want/have/need
to use my own body for color print film and will really
only be able to use IR if I get another body to try out.
I will report back on the success of that experiment when I can.
As an aside, regarding the recent discussions of hand coloring,
I plan on hand coloring at least 1 print for the couple whose
wedding I am photographing. If I get to use IR I hope I get one
that is good enough to color, otherwise it will probably be
regular B&W.
For the record, my favorite combo is Luminos Tapestry paper,
or Kodak Fiber Based Fine Art and my arsenal of Marshall Photo
oils (Master set,) pecils (14 pencil set,) regular oil paints
and the SpotPens color #1, #2 & #3 sets.
Marshall's, in addition to a book, has a video "Handcoloring
Photographs" which I have not seen. There is another book,
"Handtinting Photographs" by Judy Martin and Anne Colbeck
which I have also not seen (Sorry!)
They are all available from Light Impressions, 800-828-6216
and by fax 800-828-5539 (1-716-442-7318 internationally)
Sorry for the pitch - great catalog though.
-Adam.
------------------------------
Topic No. 13
|