Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Flea market aquisitions


  • From: Bobbie Doyle <doyleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Flea market aquisitions
  • Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 08:26:43 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 26 Aug 1996, George L Smyth wrote:

> You won't find it grainy because, of course, it's 4X5 (unless you shoot
> it real slow).  4X5 IR is quite a different animal because its resulting
> grain structure is more in the order of Konica, but it extends to
> 900nm.  It's lotsa fun.

Since I have yet to shoot my Konica film, I was wondering if some of you
with experience with both Kodak and Konica would explain some differences
between them. From what I gather thus far, Konica has less grain and more
contrast.  It appears that the IR effect is not as extreme as with Kodak
either. In other words.....why choose one over the other?

One other thing.  If I were to shoot some of the Konica without the red
filter, would I treat it as any other B&W film? For instance, would I use
various filters....like you do with regular B&W film?

And, I don't think we should talk about doughnuts.....unless I can have
one! :-)

Bobbi 



------------------------------

End of INFRARED-PHOTOGRAPHY Digest 44
*************************************