Re: Maximizing Grain

[Bobbie Doyle <doyleb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 5 Sep 1996, Vaughan Bromfield wrote:

> I have begun to consider the WWW as the ultimate digital output device for
> "printing" images. It's cheap. You can do it with a modest computer (since
> web images are quite small a 16 MB machine is adequate) and a whole lot of
> people can see the results!

I am working on a file for a Web page, and some of my scanned images look
pretty good. Although, I have to do lots of Photoshop corrections to make
them look acceptable on the monitor. And speaking of a whole lot of people
seeing the results......I forgot to look on Cor's, George's...Willem's,
Joe's page...have I left anyone out? Do you guys have a copyright notice
posted anywhere on your pages? All it takes to steal an image is left
mouse click....save this image as. Some of you mentioned that the image
would not be usable at 72dpi. But, I did see where someone found an image
and then worked with it and ended up using it as a background for their
page. I suppose you mean that it wouldn't look very good if someone wanted
to end up with a printed copy. I guess this is not off topic, in the sense
that most of you have IR images on your pages. 

> I'm working on my WWW pages now -- no IR images yet -- I just have to get
> them onto a server. (In their wisdom my University has decreed "No Personal
> WWW Pages or You're Fired". No, I'm not kidding. Everybody else in the
> organisation can put stuff up, but not us in the computer division!
> <frown>)

We are fortunate here at our University in that our computing center
allows personal Web pages and with no censorship.

Bobbi



------------------------------

Topic No. 11