Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Exposure and development control


  • From: boblong@xxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Long)
  • Subject: Re: Exposure and development control
  • Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 21:08:47 GMT

On Tue, 22 Oct 1996 18:53:44 +0100, Peter Ray wrote:

|That development seems like plenty to give full-bodied negs. Your =
mistake
|might be in drifting below 68 degrees for the developer.

The t&t chart I used was, of course, for full-strength D-76, but there
was a temperature curve going through the reference point at 11
minutes, so I followed that.  It did go below 76F or whatever the
solutions were at.

|. Then there is always
|the question of what was done at the processor. Unfortunately, price

Not a factor.  The negatives were visibly very flat, and the proof
sheet merely reflects that flatness.  Had I made it myself, I would
have switched to a higher contrast paper, but that's too much to ask
of Kodalux, I guess.


Bob Long
(boblong@xxxxxxxxxxx)

------------------------------

Topic No. 7