Re: Exposure and development control

[peteray@xxxxxxxxxx (Peter Ray)]

>Not a factor.  The negatives were visibly very flat, and the proof
>sheet merely reflects that flatness.  Had I made it myself, I would
>have switched to a higher contrast paper, but that's too much to ask
>of Kodalux, I guess.

Sorry, what I meant to suggest was that the film development might not have
been done well. What is Kodalux anyway? It used to be labs they owned, I
believe and now its part of a battle to control the giant amateur film
processing market. Again, sorry for not being clearer. With all the trouble
that IR can be, I say head on down and get yourself a Patterson tank or
find a custom processor.

So long,

Peter



------------------------------

Topic No. 21