Re: How to judge your negative (was Re: Times and

[Cor Breukel <cor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 30 Oct 1996, Tom Benedict wrote:

> So does anyone have a list of developers and the results?  Would this
> possibly be a good thing for the Gallery to have?  Say take a roll of
> 35mm HIE, run the whole thing on the same image, then chop it into
> chips and develop it in each of several developers, then put the results
> on the Gallery?

.well when I launced the idea of a Gallery in my enthusiasm (sp?) I also
wanted to include some sort of a table  as you suggest. One of the people
who opposed against such a table was George (L Smyth), stating that
there are so many ways to so may different IR images that it has no use to
give recipies. I now agree with him  (..the discussion between Rob Long,
George and me are in a way a proof of this..) 

The inbetween solution is that when you submit an image to the Gallery,
also include the technical details.
 
Bear in mind though that the "hardcopy" image will and shall look
different on different monitors. When I get an image in, I almost always
have to tweek it a bit (yes dangerous) to make it look good (ofcourse my
idea how it should look, thusfar no complains though ;-) )

One last personal remark: The Gallery is taking quite some time from me ,
I'am not so keen on putting togheter a table as well...

> don't help.  It would be nice to SEE the results and judge for myself what
> developer I want to use.
> 
> Tom
> 

Cor Breukel 
http://ruly70.medfac.leidenuniv.nl/~cor/cor.html
"The Infrared Gallery"
http://ruly70.medfac.leidenuniv.nl/~cor/ir-gallery.html


------------------------------

Topic No. 6