Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: HIE Bulk
- From: "Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
- Subject: Re: HIE Bulk
- Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 21:27:17 +0000
On 2 Dec 96 at 11:27, Ibrahim PAMUK (Ank) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This the answer I got from B+H for roll HIE and infrared filters:
>
> a) 35mm x 150ft Kodak High Speed Infrared b&w film (cat. no.160 4149) =
> 139.50
Mmm....that's an awful lot better than my $250 Dutch quote....:-))
Maybe it's time to look out for a bulk loader....;-))
> The price seems reasonably weel if you consider the troubles of getting
> the film. I understand the idea og handling the big roll consisting of
> thirty 36 exp. casettes. This would last more than two maybe three
> years. I still use film from a roll which does not have a label or
> anykind of writing on the film and metal bulk case which is more than 8
> years old. A friend has brought it over from USA. I have some level of
> fog. I do not think that it is HIE since it is seems to be slower, I
> should bear in mind the age of film which it had lived with me only. If
> you order HIE it is around $8 as 36 exp. I think I will take the risk of
> handling problems and order it.
Some notes, both technical and customs related:
- the most convenient way of cutting this bulk down seems to be all
at once, to prevent multiple thawing/freezing operations....less
obstructive packing in the freezer as well....
- not sure if one can get *metal* empty cartridges, and for both
plastic cartridge and cannister goes: be sure they are IR-proof. I
doubt many people have done this IR-reloading, so experience is
scarce.
- you might ask a friend in the US to buy it, strip the expiration
date, and ship it as old, expired film, with a similar low
value....;-))
--
Bye,
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ illem _/ _/ an _/ _/ _/ arkerink
_/_/_/
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
------------------------------
Topic No. 7
|