Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: I guess I'll do it, too. - Reply
- From: "Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
- Subject: Re: I guess I'll do it, too. - Reply
- Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 19:34:56 +0000
On 14 Dec 96 at 15:42, francisco sandoval wrote:
> It seems that I do not know anything about IR films, and you know it
> all, I do not want anybody to get mad with me because I ask to much
> about basic stuff...
Nobody gets mad at anyone, we are all here to learn (and nobody
certainly knows it all!)
There is no minimum level required, although you might learn faster
if you download the document "frequently asked questions about
infrared" (IR-FAQ). You can find a link to this document on my
homepage:
http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm
(I assume you have a web-browser like Netscape to read these HTML
pages?)
> I just have used the 25 red filter, what would I get with other filters
> (contrast, like in normal b/w)..... Francisco ;)
Contrast indeed increases if you use darker filters, but foliage also
shows more white. The darker the filter, the less visible light is
recorded, and the more real infrared (only relatively, since you *do*
need to increase exposure 1 or 2 stops).
The range of filters, from light to dark, is:
#21 orange
#25 red
#70
#89B (visible limit in front of a lens)
#88 (visible limit with naked eye)
#87
#87C
#87B
#87A
--
Bye,
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ illem _/ _/ an _/ _/ _/ arkerink
_/_/_/
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
------------------------------
Topic No. 4
|