Re: hello

["Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>]

On 17 Dec 96 at 3:21, francisco sandoval wrote:

> > I read one's that someone was using IR film on studio portraits, can
> > someone tell me what is good about it, on a studio with flash and no
> > vegetation at all.....
> > 
> > Francisco Sandoval
> > Guatemala

Check my wedding pictures in the IR-Gallery, linked on my homepage:

http://www.a1.nl/homepag/markerink/mainpage.htm

Although these are still outdoor pictures, the foliage is not a major 
subject in them, I could have taken similar shots in a concrete 
surrounding (some pic's don't have any foliage in them I believe). 
Flash bulbs also emitt a lot of IR (as well as UV), they don't differ 
much from sunlight. You can even use invisible flash; might be nice 
when taking unobtrusive pictures of children or animals.

The same non-foliage argument goes for almost all of my IR-winter 
pictures....check these out on both my own photochapter and the 
IR-Gallery!

There is much, much more to Kodak HIE than foliage only!

--
Bye,

       _/      _/       _/_/_/_/_/       _/_/_/_/_/
     _/  _/  _/               _/       _/  _/  _/
     _/  _/ illem    _/     _/ an    _/  _/  _/ arkerink
                     _/_/_/  



      The desire to understand 
is sometimes far less intelligent than
     the inability to understand


<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]

------------------------------

Topic No. 11