Re: 4x5 halo (was: 4x5 camera suggestions

[boblong@xxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Long)]

On Fri, 14 Feb 1997 19:20:59 GMT, Ed Lukacs wrote:

|Now I know that there are those out there who are saying that Ed's
|not playing with a full deck, but I submit that it's the only plausible

I never did!  (Not audibly, anyway.)  :)

|reason that I've been able to come up with in all the many years that I
|have volubly cursed HIE.=20
|
|Any comments?

Interesting speculation.  Willem has pointed to the need to specify,
for government-contract purposes, that the product will remain
available and unchanged.  But I've never before seen any hint why that
particular parameter should have been part of the original product
definition.

Bob Long
(boblong@xxxxxxxxxxx)

------------------------------

End of INFRARED-PHOTOGRAPHY Digest 211
**************************************