Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: UK traffic cameras without film
- From: "Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
- Subject: Re: UK traffic cameras without film
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 01:42:26 +0000
On 17 Mar 97 at 17:29, Marcel Volkerts wrote:
> My experience is that cars are always photographed from
> the back, after having firing some "you are speeding"
I do hope you don't count on this, not even in Holland, and not even
from the same-side road situation. I also thought both rear-flash and
same-side situation were absolute requirements, but they once flashed me
in the face from the other side nonetheless. And yes, a ticked
followed.
In Germany a picture of the driver is required to make any ticket
even legal, and the same thing might apply to the UK.
It's not always a red flash, but I know of tickets, with added
picture (look Mom, that's me!) that the offender wasn't aware of (why
didn't they tell me, I could have smiled instead of poking in my
nose!).
> sensor so using SFX like films would at best give you an
> impression of the drivers haircut. Besides,
> photographing a reflecting license plate on a car on a
> lit way and a driver in a dark car would require a film
> that is capable of handling quite an intensity range. So
> I don't buy that story Russ, sorry, but thanks for
> taking the effort to explain.
One other argument is that of haze/fog penetration. You don't want
this cash-generator malfunction in bad weather. In the UK and Holland
that would cause a painful lack of funds.
Btw, license plates are also extremely reflective in IR, same as many
retroreflective surfaces (bicycle tires, safety jackets etc). Tried
that once with a night vision tube, staggering reflection, IMO even
more pronounced/higher contrasts than in visible light.
--
Bye,
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ illem _/ _/ an _/ _/ _/ arkerink
_/_/_/
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
------------------------------
End of INFRARED-PHOTOGRAPHY Digest 240
**************************************
|