Smaller than optimal pinholes

[Dwight Shackelford <bubbha@xxxxxxxxxx>]

The other day someone said that using smaller than optimal pinholes will
lead to image degradation.  I have heard this, but was told by someone
who does a lot of pinhole work that he just keeps getting finer
resolution and longer exposure times.

Does anyone have any experience with this?  What have your images looked
like when using smaller than optimal pinhole apertures?

- -- 
\     Dwight Shackelford  *=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*
=8{:)  e-mule from Jack Ass-cii *=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*
 \  	Visit my web page: http://www.hooked.net/~bubbha/whatsama.htm
*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====**=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*=====*
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------