RE: konica deveopment - or lack thereof

[hannu.jarventaus@xxxxxxxx]

>From: 	curtis byers[SMTP:jetman@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 	12. kes=E4kuu 1997 0:48
>To: 	infrared@xxxxx
>Subject: 	konica deveopment - or lack thereof
>
>Hello. I have experience with Konica 750 in the past and have gotten=20
>good, if not contrasty, results from it. But recently I shot a roll=20
>using flash (nothing new), a red #29 filter over the lens, (normally
>use=20
>a #25) and exsposed normally like I have in the past. I did use a new=20
>developer, the X-tol. 10 minutes @ 70 degrees, 1:1 dilution. What I got
>
>was vveerryy thin negatives, as well as a bizare look in which the=20
>models viens really popped out. Why the thin negs? Thanks for any help.
>  =20
>Curtis=20

My developing time for Konica IR 750 with undiluted XTOL
is 9 minutes at 20C, so I guess you should have developed=20
longer using 1+1 dilution.

Hannu Jarventaus
Espoo, Finland
hannu.jarventaus@xxxxxxxx


>
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------