Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
RE: Medium format (was: plastic sheets
- From: "Michael Dziak" <fetch_the_ball@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Medium format (was: plastic sheets
- Date: Sat, 5 Jul 97 15:10:49 UT
Ilford SFX200 is definitely going to be available soon for 120. I was at a
Ilford seminar for photography teachers last weekend where Wendy Erickson said
they were testing the SFX 200 in 120. She did not say when it would be
available. I,ve shot 2 rolls of the 35mm version with a #29 filter. You
could not tell it from ordinary panchromatic film with that filter.. Ilford
says you need the B&W #92 infrared filter to get the right result. The
problem with that filter is its so dark you must use a tripod and zone focus,
or focus then put on the filter to shoot. I'll let you know what I find next
week.
Happy shooting
Mike Dziak
- ----------
From: owner-infrared@xxxxx on behalf of Jaap Los
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 1997 8:00 AM
To: infrared@xxxxx
Subject: Re: Medium format (was: plastic sheets
Willem-Jan Markerink wrote:
>
> On 4 Jul 97 at 18:13, Jaap Los wrote:
>
> > Besides my 35 mm equipment I have a Bronica ETRSi 4.5x6 cm together
> > with three lenses. In my opinion an ideal IR camera just as your Mamiya
> > 645. Yours is a great camera! I'm also thinking about trying Konica
> > 750. Sooner or later I will be glad to hear from you about your
> > experiences! I like the Kodak HIE because of it's greater latitude. One
> > says that the Konica is very contrasty although sharper and has a finer
> > grain. It's not a real IR film, it only peaks at 750 Nm. Could the
> > Ilford SFX 200 be an alternative?? In the book of Laurie White there is
> > an example and a comparison of the two films (Kodak and Konica). I like
> > the Kodak picture. Still I want to try it to convince myself! Anyway,
> > I'll keep you informed.
>
> Jaap, are you aware that there is a 70mm back available for the
> Bronica ETRS(i) series?....;-))
> At least one member of this list uses one.
> Ilford SFX 200 has been promised as 120, but sofar no confirmation.
>
> The striking fact is that decades ago, Ilford had a leading position in
> IR-emulsions (only plates AFAIK).
> Any UK-members old enough to give some insight in their past and
> present motives?
>
> --
> Bye,
>
> Willem-Jan Markerink
>
> The desire to understand
> is sometimes far less intelligent than
> the inability to understand
>
> <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
> [note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
> *
> ****
> *******
> ******************************************************
> * To remove yourself from this list, send: *
> * UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
> * to *
> * MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
> *----------------------------------------------------*
> * For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
> * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
> ******************************************************
Willem Jan,
Thanks for the information! Yes, it could be a good idea of trying 70 mm
HIE on my Bronica. At least I have then the advantage of having a larger
format for my enlargements although I'm not so much worried about the
grain of HIE. Still interesting!
Cheers,
Jaap Los
Holland
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
------------------------------
|