Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Thick Negatives


  • From: George L Smyth <GLSmyth@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Thick Negatives
  • Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 07:40:40 -0400

Ken Schneider wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm just curious... is there any way to tell whether having thick negatives
> is due to overexposure or incorrect development time?  How would someone
> know if they actually have the correct exposure but have been developing
> their film wrong?  What do underdeveloped and overdeveloped IR negatives
> look like?

If the exposed portion goes outside the rectangular area, then it is certainly
"overexposed."  "Underdevelopment" and "overdevelopment" will show itself in the
contrast.  I place quotes around these thing because these "mistakes" may well be
what was intended.  To obtain an ethereal quality in my images, I will "overexpose"
the film, which yielding a low contrast negative.

george

- -- 
 Handmade Photographic Images     
  http://www2.ari.net/glsmyth/
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------