Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Kodak Infrared freshness
- From: "Tim Rudman" <tim.rudman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Kodak Infrared freshness
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 10:10:37 +0100
I can confirm George's comments. I have used both steel and plastic tanks
for I-R for 25 years and find no difference - except that I had a Paterson
tank split on me once when 'rapping' it to dislodge air bubbles.
Tim Rudman
-----Original Message-----
From: George L Smyth <GLSmyth@xxxxxxx>
To: infrared@xxxxx <infrared@xxxxx>
Date: 20 October 1998 23:24
Subject: Re: Kodak Infrared freshness
>kim navarre wrote:
>>
>> I would not take chances with Kodak infrared. In fact, being that I
obsess
>> about the developing stage, I also load AND develop it in total darkness.
>> Mostly because I use the plastic tank and reels.
>
>Plastic tanks pose no problems. The only tanks that might possibly present
a
>problem are the ones that would crack anyway when rapping them after the
first
>set of inversion. I've had zero problems with my Patterson tank.
>
>george
>
>--
>
>Handmade Photographic Images
>http://www2.ari.net/glsmyth/
>*
>****
>*******
>******************************************************
>* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
>* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
>* to *
>* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
>*----------------------------------------------------*
>* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
>* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
>******************************************************
>
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|