Re: underexposed=no grain???

[felix <felix@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think this is true for IR film. 

Felix 

At 11:08 PM 3/9/99 EST, you wrote:
>
>In a message dated 3/10/99 1:29:08 AM, ambersexton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
><<but if you just 
>underexpose there shouldn't be an increase in grain, but a 
>decrease.>>
>
>Wow, not in any of the film I've shot or have seen.  
>Anytime I see any b/w or color negs that are over or under, there is an
>increase of grain.  And I see plenty of under and over negs (I work with
>beginning photo students).
>Anyone else habe an opinion on this?
>*
>****
>*******
>******************************************************
>*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
>*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
>*       to                                           *
>*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
>*----------------------------------------------------*
>*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
>*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
>******************************************************
>
>

*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************