Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Chlorophyll absorption
- From: George L Smyth <GLSmyth@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Chlorophyll absorption
- Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 17:59:10 -0400
Willem-Jan Markerink wrote:
>
> A nice article, in addition to the IR-reflection of chlorophyll:
>
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> FROM: Marcangelo Puccio <mpuccio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> SUBJECT: Re: Night Vision Green?
> DATE: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 21:40:11 -0700
> NEWSGROUPS: sci.optics,sci.physics
>
> Jim Mansfield wrote:
>
> > In article <37091C73.7E228490@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > Erik Max Francis <max@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >Thomas Jaworowski wrote:
> >
> > [snip night vison goggles being green - I haven't a clue why they are]
> >
> > >I haven't heard of that, but the Sun's frequencies peak at green, so it
> > >makes sense that we would see best at around that peak frequency. Also,
> > >it's awfully convenient of chlorophyll (and other such molecules) absorb
> > >energy around the peak frequency, in order to maximize the amount of
> > >available energy available for photosynthesis.
> >
> > Doesn't there seem to be something conflicting about plant leaves _looking_
> > green (ie, reflecting green light) and their absorbing energy at the
> > Sun's peak frequency of green? Chlorophyll has absorption maxima in
> > the blue and, to a lesser extent, in the red.
> >
> > -Jim
> >
> > --
> > Jim Mansfield Internet: Jim.Mansfield@xxxxxx
> > National Research Council of Canada Phone: (204) 984-5191
> > Institute for Biodiagnostics Fax: (204) 984-5472
> > http://www.ibd.nrc.ca/~mansfield/
>
> Yes - you are right.
>
> Plants photosynthesize poorly at best if illuminated by light at around 530
> nm. The following numbers are rough, but peak absorption in the red end is at
> around 650 nm for Chlorophyll-a and at around 670-680 for Chlorophyll-b.
> Peaks in the blue end are at around 440 and 460, respectively, with absorption
> minima between 500 and 600 nm. Some plants have 'accessory pigments' that are
> able to absorb light pretty well in the 500 nm range (i.e., carotenoid piments
> like beta carotene). These form part of an 'antenna complex' that channels
> energy from these other wavelengths to the chlrorophyll molecules that are the
> core of the photosystems. Some aquatic 'plants' (algae, actually) have
> radically different absorptions that reflect the fact that certain wavelengths
> of light are absorbed or reflected from sea water (i.e., red and golden algae
> or 'seaweeds').
>
> Not that this is a photobiology newsgroup... just had to comment!
>
> -Marco
But chlorophyll is not the reason for the strong reflectance of infrared
radiation. The strong reflection is due to the air pockets between the cells
within the leaf.
george
--
Handmade Photographic Images
http://www2.ari.net/glsmyth/
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|