Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
87c, Red 25, and more...
- From: "Jon Witsell" <wfc27@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: 87c, Red 25, and more...
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 12:44:04 PDT
Eckhard,
No...this wasn't rational...this was me trying to learn photography and
learn IR exposure all at the same time--quite an irrational experience
occasionally! Your notes seem to me to be right on (if there is any "right
on" in IR...). I was (am) still trying to translate black and white
technique to IR--and the "film speed" component confused me.
I have to thank listmember Gary Hall for sending me a long message and
getting me over my latest IR exposure obstacle
Jon
>Sorry, but this doesn't seem to be rational (perhaps I simply understood
>you wrong ??). If you used a fixed shutter speed / aperture combination
>like 1/125 f 11, you wouldn't have to meter at all. IMO, this is quite a
>dangerous recipe. In very bright sunlight, 1/125 f11 should be okay with
>a Wratten #25, but with a #87C you will get severely underexposed negs.
>According to my notes, something like 1/3 s f11 would be the right
>exposure for a #87C in bright sunlight. But I would'nt take any such
>figure for granted, beacuse there are far too many variables involved.
>If you meter at ASA 12 without the filter and bracket over +/- 1
>APERTURE (not ASA) stops, your chances to get printable negs will
>significantly increase.. :-)
>
> > Oops, forgot one:
> >
> > I have just started developing my own film. Kodak lists HC-110/dilution
>B,
> > for 5 min. at 68f.
>
>Be careful with the development times for HIE given by Kodak. I found
>that if you expose the film according to the manufacturer's
>recommendations (and ISO 12 with a #87C is pretty much what Kodak tells
>you), the "official" development times lead to underdeveloped negs.
>Apparently, other people have made this experience, too. Just compare
>Laurie White's table of development times (p.97) to the one that comes
>with the film package. Laurie's times are about 25 % longer - ad she is
>right !!!
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|