Re: Maco thought

[pauck@xxxxxx (Marco Pauck)]

> > Right, washing before exposure was suggested by the MACO folks while
> > talking about the pro & cons of the anti-halation layer.
> > 
> > However, I would prefer to choose from two alternative confections
> > right out of the factory instead of messing with the film in the dark.
[...]
> Yes Marco is right. They do say you can soak the film for 1 minute
> in just water to get the green dye out. Then what? Hang it up
> to dry in the darkroom and take a nap until you can put it back
> in it's container?

Excellent idea!  ;-)

But to get serious again: They are right know considering whether to
produce the film with or without anti-halation layer. The scientific
community votes for "with", of course. I suggested to produce both
versions. This may turn into reality if the minimum production
run of about 6000 rolls can be guaranteed.

However, it should be considered that the halation effect that results
from an ommission of the anti-halation layer would be stronger than
Kodak's because the base of MACO's film is clear while Kodak's is grey.
Hmmm, I think I should give it a try. Where's my rocking chair ...  ;-)

	Marco
-- 
Marco Pauck - WMD GmbH Hamburg, Germany - http://www.pauck.de/marco/
e-mail: marco@xxxxxxxx, phone: +49-40-58958-120, fax: +49-40-58958-199
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat,
and wrong.  -- H. L. Mencken
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************