Re: Filter question -unexp/processed e6 equals ??

[George L Smyth <glsmyth@xxxxxxxxx>]

It's equivalent to the 87.  You can read about it by going to
glsmyth.freewebsites.com and clicking on "Making An Improvised Infrared
Transmitting Filter by Andrew Davidhazy".

Cheers -

george

--- "Dan G. Ster" <dangster@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I’ve searched a little bit, but haven’t found the “easy” answer to :
> 
> Using unexposed but processed e-6 as a filter for IR.
> Which filter does it compare to most as far as blocking visible light?
> 
> *
> ****
> *******
> ******************************************************
> *  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
> *         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
> *       to                                           *
> *         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
> *----------------------------------------------------*
> *   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
> *  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
> ******************************************************
> 

=====
Handmade Photographic Images
http://glsmyth.freewebsites.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************