Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Metering question
- From: "Joseph O'Neil" <joneil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Metering question
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 07:46:07 -0400
At 21:03 12/07/00 -0400, you wrote:
>I haven't shot many rolls of Konica 750--but the lab I worked in process
>about ten for a photographer and they all came out blank. My understanding
>of some filters are that they pretty much cut out all light below 800nm.
>Konica has peak sensitivity at 750(hence the name). Shooting with opaque
>filters is just about the same as shooting with your metal lens cap on.
I had almost the same thing happen to me when I last used an
opaque IR filter. The problme was, nto enough light. I did aseries of
bracketed shots under cloudy skies, not full sunlight, witht he lens
stopped down (I forget exactly where).
Anyhow, the two tiem expsoures I did at 4 and 5 minutes had a very
slight, underexposed image, but he rest was blank.
I find Konia 750 very slow, and to that end, I woudl reccomend the
Maco 820. Faster, more sensitive to IF, nice film to work with, and it
looks more like Konica than it does HIE.
But back to the orginal thread - where to meter Konica 750? REAL
sloooooow. As in under 10 ISO. I think the film unfiltered is no better
than 25 to 50, in my limited expereince.
joe
http://www.oneilphoto.on.ca
http://www.multiboard.com/~joneil
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|