Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Forest Fires - off topic (Was RE: Testing)
- From: Clive Warren <Clive.Warren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Forest Fires - off topic (Was RE: Testing)
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 09:42:18 +0100
At 12:45 pm +0000 2/8/00, Dirk Wright wrote:
>
>
>>Was shocked to hear that 63,270 acres of the Sequoia National Forest,
>>near Ridgecrest on the eastern side of the Sierra Nevada (120 miles
>>north of LA) have been destroyed by fire.
>>
>
>The ecology of the region depends on fires to clear out the dead plant litter
>on the ground in order for seed roots to be able to extend down far enough to
>grow in real soil. The charcoal from the fire is "activated", thus making it
>an excellent water filter. So, when it rains, with an acidic pH and full of
>pollution, the charcoal tree remains will make the water pure with a neutral
>pH. The streams will then better support aquatic life.
>
>Only people think that fire is bad.
>
>--
>Be Seeing You.
>Dirk Wright
Thanks for the ecological clarification. I do appreciate the positive
aspects of fires in regeneration, however the size of the fires is
awesome. In the UK if we had a fire which consumed 100 acres there
would be uproar and demands for the government to resign for poor
management of the fire services ;-)
As the forested areas in the world become smaller and smaller, surely
the wildlife in those areas is threatened as their potential habitat
becomes smaller. There must have been a lot of roasted animals and
insects in those fires - which are still burning.....
The question which springs to mind is how big is too big? What if
the fires consumed all of the forested areas where they are currently
burning? Would this be good for the ecology?
Controlled burns seem to be a good idea (until they go out of
control) and surely a better way of managing forest areas.
Maybe the wildlife also think that fire is bad :-)
--
All the best,
Clive http://www.cocam.co.uk
Photographic Services, Filters and Equipment, Infrared FAQ
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|