Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

RE: NIKON autofocus choices and IR


  • From: "Charles Jay Pilzer" <cjp@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: NIKON autofocus choices and IR
  • Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 01:24:45 -0400

My previous posting was a result of the message posted by Jaap Los on
Monday, August 28, 2000 2:36 PM in which he stated:

"...The 80 is indeed not suitable for IR  I suspect that the 100 and the 5
are also not suitable for IR...."

My concern has to do with whether both the F5 and F100 will autofocus
Infrared light properly.

I have no concern that a camera which uses IR to count the frames can create
fog, because neither the F5 nor the F100 use an IR frame counter.

cj

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-infrared@xxxxx [mailto:owner-infrared@xxxxx]On Behalf Of
> Mjs53@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 11:50 PM
> To: infrared@xxxxx
>
> Both the F5 and F100 are suitable for IR.  I have been using
> the F100 for
> about a year now without any problem.
> You are correct about the N80, it is not infrared safe.
>

*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************