Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Christina's IR Info
Chris, thanks for sending me a copy. Looks like you are being very
thorough in trying to address possible IR problems. There's a lot of
material to cover, but for now here are my thoughts on the questions
which were raised.
1. Putting a color filter over the lens will DECREASE the amount of
visible light rays that hit ANY film. A green filter will pass all
the green light and block some of the red and blue. A red filter will
allow the red light to go through and will block some of the blue and
green. A lighter red filter, like a # 23A will block less B and G
than a deep red like a # 29. Virtually all color filters will pass
the infrared rays [the only exception I can think of is the
# 18A which blocks most of the wavelengths above 800 or so]. Purely
IR filters, such as the # 87 series and the # 88A will transmit ONLY
IR, no visible light. IR films are sensitive to visible light AND to
IR rays. We need to filter out some or all of the visible light in
order to get the "IR effects" that we like.
2. This leads to an answer to the second question: Yes, there is a difference
in using the 15, 25 and 29 filters with Konica, but it can be very
subtle. As you know, the film's sensitivity peaks at 750nm [hence the
name]. Since different color filters pass certain wavelengths in
different degrees, they can be used for different effects. I have
tested Konica 750 with the # 3, 8, 12, 15, 23A, 25, 87 and 89B. I
like the results with the # 12 and # 15 best.
Incidentally, whatever filter factors are recommended, test for
yourself. [It could be that 12+ stops is the correct compensation for
the # 87C]. There are a lot of variables involved.
3. As for fluorescent lights in the darkroom that take a while to
subside, I don't wait more than a minute or so after turning them off
to begin loading film holders or developing tanks and have had no
problems.
4. Rodinal is a wonderful developer, but it does not produce "fine
grain" with soft edges. It produces sharp grain. The individual
photographer has to decide whether he or she likes the results. As
usual, my solution is TEST FOR YOURSELF.
BTW, what age are your students and what is their level of
photography experience?
Cheers, Bill
William Rivelli
WILLIAM RIVELLI PHOTOGRAPHY
rivelli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.rivelli-william.com
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|