Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Fw: IR 750 Sensitivity
- From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Fw: IR 750 Sensitivity
- Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 10:50:05 -0500
Just make certain that the green inanimate object is really just green.
Try doing tests using a wratten green cutoff filter (I've forgotten the
number, is it 58?)
Dan C.
At 08:07 AM 07-11-00 -0700, Christina Z. Anderson wrote:
> Yeah, Dan, on my sheet the graph shows two humps and no _anything_ at
>the green part of the spectrum; the question has been is it "low
>sensitivity" as you say or "blindness" as two books say, and now Konica
>says, as in the attached post below.
> So this morning I woke up with a possible answer--others dream nice
>dreams and I am trying to figure out why the Konica company says Konica 750
>is "blind" to green light instead of saying it is "less sensitive" and I got
>it: check me out and see if this is not right: of course trees (green) do
>not turn clear (black on a print) on Konica film (one reason given for
>disproof of its green blindness) because they always reflect IR light,
>right, even without a red filter on the camera they are still going to
>reflect IR light and affect the film, correct? So the only way to really
>test this theory is to take a green inanimate object and theoretically take
>a picture of it where there would be no IR light available and see if the
>negative is clear where the green object is. Maybe it isn't possible to
>take all IR waves out of light (Andrew D. you could answer this one; aren't
>you proficient in the science of photography?) so therefore, technically, it
>would be impossible to see something green/unlighted render a clear
>negative. Therefore, Konica could be right. Just that it doesn't really
>mount to a hill of beans, anyway, as far as film exposure goes, unless the
>IR is low and you are photographing an entire green wall or some such thing.
>OK I'll stop on this thread, as no one probably gives a hoot! OH, maybe when
>I get Rolland's HIE in the mail I can go out and shoot green things with
>both the HIE and Konica and see if there is a dif. On second thought, that
>would be a bit expensive...
>Chris
>> I have a data sheet lying around somewhere which showed quite clearly a
>low
>> spot around green on a spectral sensetivity curve for Konica 750.
>>
>> Dan C.
>>
>> At 10:32 PM 06-11-00 -0500, ADavidhazy wrote:
>> >> OK, list; here's the answer I finally got; Andy Davidhazy, what do you
>make
>> >> of this??? Hey, I'll let you be the one to process it under a green
>light
>> >> and tell me if it gets fogged or not. Me, I'll just not trust it...
>> >> Chris
>> >
>> >Veeerrrryyy interesting. Just remember that I claimed to have made this
>> >deduction, based on postings on this list, first! ;-) call it the
>> Davidhazy
>> >and Company safelight processing guide for Konica 750 film!
>> >
>> >BTW, please note that even if this IS true (which I very much doubt) you
>> would
>> >need an IR absorbing filter in addition to the green filter to use as a
>> >safelight ... unless the green filter one happens to get is opaque to red
>and
>> >very near IR ... as well as to blue of course.
>> >
>> >adios,
>> >
>> >Andrew o o 0 0 o . o Davidhazy, Imaging and Photo Tech
>> > \/\/\/\/\/\/ http://www.rit.edu/~andpph
>> >__________| |_____________________________________
>> >
>> >
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: Todd Tereshkow <Tereshkow_T@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> To: <tracez@xxxxxxx>
>> >> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 6:09 PM
>> >> Subject: IR 750 Sensitivity
>> >
>> >> > Christina,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you for your interest in Konica IR750 film. The film
>> >> > is essentially blind in the green part of the spectrum. The red
>filter
>> >> will
>> >> > give you the most vivid IR effect compared to the orange filter. I
>would
>> >> > recommend that you experiment with both filters and bracket the
>exposure
>> >> to
>> >> > find the appropriate exposure level and IR effect that you are
>looking
>> >> for.
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards,
>> >> >
>> >> > Todd O. Tereshkow
>> >> > Vice President Technical Service
>> >> > Konica Photo Imaging
>> >> > 725 Darlington Avenue
>> >> > Mahwah, NJ 07430
>> >> >
>> >> > Phone: (201)574-4070 E-Mail: tereshkow_t@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > <tereshkow_t@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: Christina Z. Anderson [mailto:tracez@xxxxxxx]
>> >> > <mailto:[mailto:tracez@xxxxxxx]> <mailto:
>> >> > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 10:41 AM
>> >> > To: film@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:film@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> > Subject: Konica 750 spectral sensitivity
>> >> >
>> >> > I've been trying to call tech help and can't seem to locate the
>correct
>> >> > place!. I have your technical data sheet with the graph of spectral
>> >> > sensitivity of Konica 750 Infrared. My question is this: is it BLIND
>to
>> >> > yellow and green light waves, as the graph looks like it shows, or is
>it
>> >> > just less sensitive in this area between 520nm and 650nm? Do you get
>> >> equal
>> >> > results with the orange 15/16, red 25 and red 29 filters therefore?
>> >> > Thanks in advance
>> >> > Chris Anderson
>> >> > PS I know you are discontinuing this film but I have it
>> >> > still.
>> >> >
>> >*
>> >****
>> >*******
>> >******************************************************
>> >* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
>> >* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
>> >* to *
>> >* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
>> >*----------------------------------------------------*
>> >* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
>> >* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
>> >******************************************************
>> >
>> >
>> *
>> ****
>> *******
>> ******************************************************
>> * To remove yourself from this list, send: *
>> * UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
>> * to *
>> * MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
>> *----------------------------------------------------*
>> * For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
>> * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
>> ******************************************************
>>
>
>*
>****
>*******
>******************************************************
>* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
>* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
>* to *
>* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
>*----------------------------------------------------*
>* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
>* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
>******************************************************
>
>
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|