Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Odd marks on negative -- help needed
- From: Don Roberts <droberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Odd marks on negative -- help needed
- Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 22:01:27 -0600
Steve, I seem to see more drying marks on BW IR than on conventional pan
films. I have no idea why. I know Photo Flo has a shelf life that is
rather indeterminate for me. Sometimes if I mix it a little too strong
I get marks; if it is a little too old I get marks. It all seems
arbitrary to me. Anyway I learned early on in my career to just dip the
first two fingers of one hand in the Photo Flo and strip the excess off
between those fingers rather than a sponge or rag. Works for me. Please
share with us the results of your tests.
Steve Homer wrote:
> Thanks for the several helpful comments about my
> stained or flawed negatives. (URL is
> http://members.cruzio.com/~shomer/stain.jpg )
>
> Several of you suggested that they might be drying
> marks. I do use Photo-Flo, mixed in distilled water; is
> it possible to get such large drying marks from that
> solution? I do not wipe the negatives with a sponge or
> squeegie; I shake the reel, and then the film hangs to
> dry at room temperature.
>
> Don Roberts asked about the orientation of the marks:
> the marks are either in line with the length of the
> film, or diagonal to it: never across the narrow width
> of the 6cm x7cm negative. So that much is consistent
> with drying marks.
>
> Does it make sense that I would see drying marks on the
> 70mm infrared film, but not on TMAX 120 processed in
> the same batch of chemistry and hung to dry in the same
> location?
>
> My Photo-Flo solution is about 60-65 degrees F (warmer
> than my wash water, but colder than the processing
> temperature), but until this Winter my Photo-Flo
> solution was always at about 70-72 degrees F. So that's
> a change in my process that I hadn't paid attention to.
> Is a cold wetting agent more likely to spot?
>
> The other suggestion was static marks. I probably wind
> it faster while I am bulk loading it in the darkroom
> than when I advance the film in the camera, but I never
> see static discharges while bulk loading.
>
> Here's how I plan to test the two theories. For the
> drying marks, I will try a distilled water rinse before
> the Photo-Flo rinse, and mix the Photo-Flo at a lower
> concentration. I'll also expect the marks to be worst
> at the bottom of the strips hanging to dry (where drips
> collect). For the static, I can try to wind the film
> more slowly in the studio, and perhaps try winding it
> with the back open in the darkroom to see if I can
> observe any static discharge. Can anyone suggest a more
> reliable test, or see problems in these tests?
>
> Thanks again for all the helpful comments.
> ____________________________________________________
> Steve Homer shomer@xxxxxxxxxx Santa Cruz, CA USA
> Technical Documentation Services 831-251-8516 (cell)
> *
> ****
> *******
> ******************************************************
> * To remove yourself from this list, send: *
> * UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
> * to *
> * MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
> *----------------------------------------------------*
> * For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
> * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
> ******************************************************
--
============================================================
Don Roberts * Bittersweet Productions * Iowa City, IA
* *
And the Devil whispered behind the leaves, "It's pretty,
but is it Art?". -- Rudyard Kipling
============================================================
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|