Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: hyperfocal
- From: Tom Deering <tmd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: hyperfocal
- Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 18:19:45 -0500
On 11/6/99, Eric Goldstein wrote:
>> If you go to the "3D Encyclopedia" page on Rocky Mountain Memories'
>> home page <URL:http://www.rmm3d.com/> you'll find an HTML reproduction
>> of the Sputnik manual which includes a hyperfocal table in meters.
>
>
>This table is wildly optimistic IMO... perhaps it is meant for viewing
>contact prints under very low or no magnification. Under normal 3x
>magnification, there is no way a 75 mm lens will yield DOF from 6 feet to
>infinity @ f/22 in MF... perhaps f/45 would get you close...
At one time, I thought DOF was based on how good the glass was. I
assumed the reason one 50mm lens had a different DOF than another
50mm was due to some inherent property of the lenses.
Then I found out that depth of field is based on a mathematical
formula. One of the variables is for a measurement of precision
called the "circle of confusion". You can think of it as a
measurement of "acceptable fuzziness". Some lens manufacturers
specify a larger COC, which gives their lens a greater DOF at the
expense of softer focus within this range. I'm guessing why the DOF
table listed above was so, let's say, optimistic.
I have a spreadsheet that calculates the DOF of the Sputnik (or any
other camera.) You can punch in the COC that you are comfortable
with. If anybody wants a copy, write to me off-list.
Tom Deering
|