Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Report on a Fringe Project
- From: Stephen Puckett <spuckett@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Report on a Fringe Project
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 13:33:55 -0800
Last week I got back my first prints from a similarly-twinned
pair of Holgas that I had bought a couple of years ago. The price
was about $US10 (now $US13.50) each from Porter's - a price which
allows some experimenting. The results (per print) were remarkably
good, rather like smearing vaseline somewhat unevenly on a filter.
The fact that the camera was MF helped because the 4"x4" print was
enlarged from the larger 6x6 negative. The result compared very
favorably with a similar experiment I had made with a pair of
Yamesheta cameras (which are cheap 'premium' cameras) and
some inexpensive Kodak cameras. The stereo base was about 5"
between lens centers which resulted in hyperstereos that were OK to
me for distant subjects.
The big problem IMO of using KrappyKameras for stereo is that the
unevenness/distortion (different between cameras) interferes with
my brain forming a 'clean' stereo image. It is similar IMO to the
problem when there is a large amount of grain. With 2D the Holga
print looks like viewing the scene thru a light mist - which may be
acceptable for an inexpensive 'mood' picture or portrait. In 3D it
looks to me like viewing thru jello (not bad to me but certainly
not my preference). There were also sharpness problems at the
edges. In the resulting stereo view, any problems with the print
seem to me to be squared, not just doubled.
The prints from the Yameshetas were similarly uneven but the
35mm negative was smaller leading to less sharpness than the Holgas
when enlarged. They also had several film transport problems which
led me to never wanting to try such cameras again - I had to unload
the cameras in a changing bag and rewind by hand). The Holgas were
fine in this regard. My neighbor had a Yameshita in his yard sale.
I offered him my 2 for free for his sale but he did not want them.
I finally trashed them - I did not want to turn off some a neophyte
Photographer forever. Now that I recognize that I am also a
Collector, though, I should have kept them ;-) Maybe there will
be a Princess Yamesheta or Holga some day and the same magic would
make them as attractive as the cheap Diana cameras are now.
I had no apparent problems with light leaks - a couple of stout
rubber bands per camera seemed to prevent that.
Since the Holga is plastic and inexpensive, this would lend itself
to hacker projects for those so inclined - especially for the film
transport portion.
---------------End of Original Message-----------------
-------------------------------------
Name: Stephen Puckett; C17A; 321-6144
Dept.: Business Technology Services
mailto:spuckett@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 12/16/98
Time: 13:05:46
TIS THE SEASON TO BE JOLLY
|