Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Pros and cons of linked/siamesed MF cameras.
- From: Brian Reynolds <reynolds@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Pros and cons of linked/siamesed MF cameras.
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 18:54:03 -0400
Tom wrote:
> Joel wrote:
> >Sam did a Ricohflex pair for me, he had to reverse one of the film
> >winding buttons to butt the cameras together. You can see a photo
> >of it on his WEB site, at URL:
> >
> > http://www.cadvision.com/3dhacker/rico.htm
>
>
> I'm thinking about making a camera like Sam's, but I have mixed
> emotions. Since I know nothing at all about MF stereo--the
> following questions are based in my minimal 35mm stereo experience.
> Any thoughts?
>
> 1. If I have separate cameras, I can shoot hyper. If I link them, then I
> save a bit of time. Which is better?
>
I shoot a lot of hypers (e.g., my landscapes of Ireland, New York
architecture), so separate cameras are a plus for me. Fiddling with
all the knobs is a minus.
> 2. Besides speed or ease, what is the benefit of twinning? Is speed really
> a factor in a camera that only gets 12 photos to the roll?
>
Speed can be a factor. Last year I tried shooting a sheep dog demo,
but it was hard to wind each camera between shots and get the action.
Ease can also be important. I hate getting film back only to realize
that I forgot to adjust the controls of both cameras.
On the other hand, having to deal with two strips of film (when
scanning or mounting) is enough of a hassle that I haven't really
given much thought to siamesing TLRs. I like Sam's Stereo Isolette
project. By having both images on a single film strip you can use the
film edge as a guide in mounting and scanning. Unfortunately I
haven't been able to find any used Isolettes in the local camera
stores.
On the gripping hand, being able to take 12 pairs at a time without
reloading is nice.
> 3. Siamising makes sense if I can make the thing smaller or lighter. With
> the focus linked, could I ditch the focusing/viewing section of
> *one* camera?
>
> 4. For that matter, why not dump *both* focusing/viewing sections? Since
> I'm shooting hyperfocal, couldn't I just use the scale on the lens
> barrel?
>
The Lubitels are already pretty light. I think both my Lubitels
mounted on a flash bracket are lighter than my Yashicamat. I don't
think you'll save enough weight by dumping both viewers (or even just
one) to justify losing the ability to compose your pictures.
--
Brian Reynolds | "Dee Dee! Don't touch that button!"
reynolds@xxxxxxxxx | "Oooh!"
NAR# 54438 | -- Dexter and Dee Dee
| "Dexter's Laboratory"
|