[MF3D.FORUM:1055] Re: Mounting issue

["Bill Glickman" <bglick@xxxxxxxx>]

David

         You re-mounted 2 of the 3 slides a sent you.  Both of these I
viewed with no problems, no eyestrain.  One was easier than the other....
the gazebo shot was a bit more hard to fully fuse at once...but not the
least bit uncomfortable.  I think this is good evidence that I can tolerate
a lot of on film deviation, right?   The third one you mentioned was pseudo,
I switched them and they worked perfect....this is how I got on my wild
goose chase about how in the world I could possibly be confusing the left
and right shot.... This may have been difficult for you to see since the
chips were already trimmed on each edge.

            Alan, I like your suggestion of metal to metal...the mounts did
have some rubber one and the QR plate had cork.  This is room for error.

Regards
Bill G


> Bill Glickman writes:
>
> > Thank you all very much for the assistance you provided in my mounting
> > dilemnas... (as well as other MF stereo issues) Dick and David, I
> > thank you for the returned slides and yes, they mounted fine.....
>
> I am curious if by "they mounted fine" you mean that you were
> able to view them without any eye strain? The reason I ask is
> that beacause at least one of them I remounted for you had
> just over 3.0mm of deviation (and yes, I do mean on film
> deviation - the distance bewteen near and far point
> homologues) as well as just over 3.0mm of separation (the
> distance between farthest homologues as measured against the
> mount aperture spacing). This was necessary to keep the close
> objects from violating the window.
>
> Many people have said that this is too much and not easily
> viewed. I found no problem at all viewing this and want to
> know what you found.
>
> That's all for now,
>
> David W. Kesner
> Boise, Idaho, USA
> drdave@xxxxxxxxxx
>