Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[MF3D.FORUM:1264] Re: Loss of detail in projection (wasRe:PSA Albuquerque report, Part II)


  • From: Richard Twichell <rmt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:1264] Re: Loss of detail in projection (wasRe:PSA Albuquerque report, Part II)
  • Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:09:58 -0400

Paul writes (excerpted):

>  Those of us hoping to show projected
> MF 3D slides at Buffalo could really use some insight into
> this.  Without MF 3D projection systems at home to test the
> images ahead of time, putting together a show could be very
> much a krapshoot (anti-filter spelling).  I'm wondering
> whether to shoot images that would work well in 35mm stereo
> projection, or ones that would work well in a MF viewer.

My answer:  shoot both!  The Buffalo MF sessions will be very much a
learning experience for us all.  I know what my stuff looks like
projected at home, but noone elses!  However, the same limitations
regarding contrast and ghosting apply as in 35mm.  Keeping this in mind,
as well as brightness, conservative deviation, and accurate mounting,
will produce pairs that project well.  For me, the hardest part of
transitioning from 35mm (7p) to MF is getting used to composing in the
1:1 aspect ratio.  5-p shooters should have no problem with this!

Dick Twichell