Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: 70MM Development discussion on Font Size and Netiquette
- From: Steve Shapiro <sgshiya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 70MM Development discussion on Font Size and Netiquette
- Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 11:25:22 -0800
Subject: Re: 70MM
Development
dear alan-i am supposed to
answer you in type so small that my spellcheck has a problem. simon
nathan
It may be easier if you didn't answer at
all.
SS
Alan Zinn wrote:
At 08:51 AM 1/7/1999 -0800, you wrote:
>The following is minimally related to panorama. I'm just calling
on >all that expertise and experience out there! >
>I have started shooting 70mm Tri-X in 5 meter rolls. I have a
Nikkor >tank and reel. Using the same agitation as with 120 in
normal tanks >which works fine (3 inversions every 30 seconds), I
get uneven edge >development, i.e. denser and contrastier edges.
If I cut back to 2 >inversions, that problem almost completely
disappears, but I'm now >getting uneven development in open
areas, i.e. blotchy skies. Other >than A.not using 70mm and B.
not shooting skies, does anybody have any >suggestions? >
>Thanks!!!
>_________________________________________________________
>DO YOU YAHOO!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com >
Andy, I used to get the same problem with 120. I pre-soak
the film for 2 minutes and it helps. Also some tank/reel designs
seem to be worse. If the film is thinner or denser near the edges
would indicate either more or less agitation. For the heck of it try
continual agitation and a bit less time.
AZ > See hand-built panoramic cameras and pictures at:
http://www.keva.com/lookaround
http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Gallery/8874
Also at Cafe Society Gallery: http://www.curdev.hull.ac.uk/root/cafe/cafegal.htm
|
|