Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Center Filter--Do I need one?
- From: Simon Nathan <simonwide@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Center Filter--Do I need one?
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 15:16:16 -0500
dear gene- you should be
able reason this out. you are half way there. you need the build up in
center. my typed lines were, at best, a generalization.you use 2xnd as
largest one an 1x at center to see what more is needed. less (fewer) slices
the better.
Gene F. Rhodes wrote:
back element is dispersal
lens. you'll have less room in front and more jiggle room inside. the angle
baffles could be removed, but don't as rear element ain't that large.
simon
Hell Sir, I was talking about my lens not yours.
Remember mine is 47mm f8 super angulon, and this
sucker is little. Lens diameter in the shutter is 7mm.
My (your) center filter design works marvelously but I
still need to add layers, at least one more. (I put a
sample photo in my page.) Drop off appear to be gone now
for fine tuning, infinity shots, pls.
at f11 but still there at f8. The gray card photo was
so light I can't make a new mask, but the old one
still works. Thanks for yelling at me.
Turnpike
wasn't yelling atchya!
Simon Nathan wrote:
whoa, there gene-
the super angulon on simon/wide is 121mm focal length.it is actual 120mm
but for duty purposes years ago they labeled it 121. angulon was called
120mm. good luck. simon says
--
II*
|