Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Tran vs neg


  • From: Steve Shapiro <sgshiya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Tran vs neg
  • Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 07:43:56 -0800

Subject: Tran vs neg


Yes, I would think that question would be very important to those of us
Panoaramic's who are scanning.  Transparency's always seem better, but would
certainly like to have more input on this

Charles of Sioux City


Input:

To kick off this thread, it is known about the consistency of reversal
(transparency) films that offer merely one and a half stops latitude in
their emulsion.  While, negative films offer as much as five stops.

I wold imagine, to scan the reversal film, the scanner would be less taxed
to render all the colors balanced at the same intensity or within a small
altitude of ay one and a half stops, and that would make scanning
transparencies easier.

SS.