Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
RE: Fuji better than Linhof? Not!? Final thoughts?.........
- From: Willem-Jan Markerink <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Fuji better than Linhof? Not!? Final thoughts?.........
- Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 21:53:26 +0000
On 27 Mar 99 at 0:23, Jim Dunn wrote:
> I was reading an article recently about a company that makes 6x9 cameras who
> where unwilling to make a wider body because they could not get film plane
> flatness to a level they where happy with ........ could this be something
> to do with the difference between the Fuji and Linhof cameras???....... and
> not the lenses.
I recently added a more general note about film flatness problems to
my homepage....quite interesting story, from a repairman:
http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm
> I have an occasional recurring problem with my ArtPanorama..... the right
> hand edge of the transparency ..... about 3 to 5cm in from the edge is often
> soft, softish or very soft..... a recent film had a what appeared to be a
> double exposure of "only" this area..... Any ideas on what is causing it and
> how to fix it............The ArtPan loads on the right and takes up on the
> left.
Is 'left' and 'right' corrected for the fact that what sits left in
the camera shows on the right in the final image?
Can you rule out that the film has been sitting some time before the
next exposure, and has formed a curl, which doesn't immediately go
away?
For my Mamiya RB 70mm back, this problem is even mentioned in the
manual, and for which it even offers a vacuum system....
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
|