Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: SFX film and IR filters


  • From: Steve Shapiro <sgshiya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: SFX film and IR filters
  • Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 09:22:32 -0700

Do you do a lot of IR photography?

The local Sheriff turned photo teacher, Henry Guilpin (Laura's cousin) now
age 75 talks about using IR film without a filter, doing nudes the way they
did bodies for the coroner, and you get a subcuteaneous view.  (Beneath the
skin.)

Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Freeman <free1000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 1999 4:34 AM
Subject: Re: SFX film and IR filters


>
>
> Steve Shapiro wrote:
>
> > What's an 89 filter
> >
>
> mmm. Maybe that isn't the right number. Its a nearly opaque filter used
> for
> IR photography. I think.
>
> >
> > Steve
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Paul Freeman <free1000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 1999 12:29 AM
> > Subject: SFX film and IR filters
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Does anyone have any experience with Ilford SFX film. I think that I
> > > read somewhere that it can benefit from exposures made with an 89
> > > filter.
> > >
> > > Any idea of what, roughly, exposure times should be?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Paul Freeman
> > >
>