Re: Invite

[Drew <anders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Moore <rtrends@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <Panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, August 03, 1999 1:14 PM
Subject: RE: Invite


Hello Roger,

>I just had the pleasure of viewing your site.  The panoramas are
>beautiful.
>Not a stitch to be found.
Many thanks
 >I must confess,  I find spherical pano's to be a
>bit nauseating to view, and have yet to find anything of interest in the
>"highs" and "lows" of the image.  That is not to be a criticism of your
>lovely work ... just a personal preference regarding the technique.
I donn`t agree with you here.Spherical panoramas looks more natural,more
information they have (it my personal view ).
In my gallery I have to panos with rapid stair (linked in Andreevskij Uzviz
Street).If you make cylindrical panorama there you`ll lose half of the
steir.The same in the Cathedral and Funicular panoramas.They have a lot to
show in zenith and in nadir points.
>  As an architectural photographer, my job is to do "glamour shots" >of
properties,
>that is, to make them look attractive, and the "warts" of a scene ore
>often
>in the "highs" and "lows" of the scene.
Often but not always. What if you have beautiful antique lustre straight up
or good looking mosaic parquet floor in the "low"...

>I suppose I should try Helmut's renound software.  I too use Live >Picture.
>How does Helmut's software interface with it?  It seems you have >used
both.
No.I used only Helmut`s tools.It more accurate and understandable for me
than other, where you put in "black box" some pictures and get one pano
back."Panorama Tools" use high quality interpolator and is very flexible.

Regards,
Drew

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
PanoWorld-full spherical panoramas
gallery       http://members.xoom.com/PanoWorld
E-mail        panoworld@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Fax           +1-419-710-5014
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>