Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Noblex 135U Questions


  • From: Willem-Jan Markerink <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Noblex 135U Questions
  • Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 17:38:08 +0100

On 24 Oct 99 at 15:32, Peter Marshall wrote:

> > dear joel- if you did carry a ladder, even one of the type that you make
> > various shapes of ladders, you'd get even more out of your swing lens
> > camera.simon from behind his panoramic rock near the wendy's in east
> > orange, new jersey
> 
> Failing a ladder or shift, you can decide to crop the negative. Deciding 
> to use a 58x19mm neg rather than 58x24mm on the Horizon gives a useful 
> amount of rise/fall and a 3:1 aspect ratio, both of which are often an 
> advantage. 
> 
> A slightly shorter focal length would come on my wish-list above shift.

Oddly enough, this is where *all* medium-format swing-lens cameras 
have an advantage over all their 35mm brothers: a 50mm lens on a 50mm 
tall frame, instead of 26mm (Widelux), 28mm (Horizon) or 29mm 
(Noblex) on a 24mm tall frame.
Or a ratio of 50/50 vs 26/24, 28/24 or 29/24....

PS: I still have a Noblex 150 for sale....;-))

Willem (who, regardless of this, could still imagine the fun of a 
Noblex 175 (75mm lens) with Alpine panoramas) Jan

--                 
Bye,

Willem-Jan Markerink


      The desire to understand 
is sometimes far less intelligent than
     the inability to understand


<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]