Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Noblex 135U Questions
- From: Willem-Jan Markerink <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Noblex 135U Questions
- Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 17:38:08 +0100
On 24 Oct 99 at 15:32, Peter Marshall wrote:
> > dear joel- if you did carry a ladder, even one of the type that you make
> > various shapes of ladders, you'd get even more out of your swing lens
> > camera.simon from behind his panoramic rock near the wendy's in east
> > orange, new jersey
>
> Failing a ladder or shift, you can decide to crop the negative. Deciding
> to use a 58x19mm neg rather than 58x24mm on the Horizon gives a useful
> amount of rise/fall and a 3:1 aspect ratio, both of which are often an
> advantage.
>
> A slightly shorter focal length would come on my wish-list above shift.
Oddly enough, this is where *all* medium-format swing-lens cameras
have an advantage over all their 35mm brothers: a 50mm lens on a 50mm
tall frame, instead of 26mm (Widelux), 28mm (Horizon) or 29mm
(Noblex) on a 24mm tall frame.
Or a ratio of 50/50 vs 26/24, 28/24 or 29/24....
PS: I still have a Noblex 150 for sale....;-))
Willem (who, regardless of this, could still imagine the fun of a
Noblex 175 (75mm lens) with Alpine panoramas) Jan
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
|