From the blind.the insensitive and the deaf

[Craig Woods <cwoods@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I wonder if the rambling muse appreciates that this is a forum, a forum of
those persuing a particular interest. I don't know what the exact number of
list members is at the moment but when one member proceeds to try and occupy
the whole forum with four or five missiles (and I use the word in its
original context) a day then they are usurping the democratic nature of the
debate. Teri, either make a positive contribution to the debate or retire
and listen gracefully. There are many of us out here who gratefully wait for
pearls of wisdom from those that are qualified to dispense them. We really
don't want to wade through the ramblings of a self-proclaimed muse. I am
quite happy to debate you through the proper channels e.g. zen, tantra or
any other -ism that you subscribe to, you name the venue but please leave
the panorama channel to panoramics, whatever the definition, it is still the
venue for wide vue images not narrow idealistic polemics.
Craig Woods
PO Box 91 Honeydew
South Africa 2040
Tel: 082-322-2851
cwoods@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sign on free at South Africa's premier auction
 site http://sa.bidorbuy.com/c/c?ID=102067
----- Original Message -----
From: <Rehotshots@xxxxxxx>
To: <panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 03 January 2000 11:10
Subject: Perception and Panorama


> He or she who can not feel is naturally insensitive.  He or she who cannot
> see naturally accuses others of being shallow and insubstantial, they
can't
> see you.  He or she who is deaf naturally declares that others have
nothing
> pertinent to say.  So, let us hear then from the insensitive, the blind
and
> the deaf.  But make certain, however,  that it is panoramic!  Whatever the
> hell that means. Always thought it meant all encompassing.  This is
directed
> to no one in particular. So, please remain unselfconcious.  Please, open
your
> hearts, your eyes and your ears and stop this incessant impatient
criticism.
> Delete it if you don't like it, without even opening it.     The only way
one
> can see themselves is by the reflection you show them of themselves.  This
is
> stifling!  Distracting!  Upsetting!  I too wish to see articles on
panorama,
> yet those who criticize offer none and offer no ideas for any.  I am a
woman,
> I therefore reserve the right to change my mind at any time regarding any
> subject  :  )     Have yet to examine the contempt here, (for me ), but my
> mirror analogy does not work even for me.  I am hurt.  I feel hurt.
Artists
> are supposed to be sensitive.  If my presence here is perceived as being
> insensitive to others then I apologize for my existence.  I simply wished
to
> love you, each and all of you.
>
>
>                                              teri
>                                                rambling muse