Re: [Fwd: seitz roundshot 220 vr] schultress

[simon nathan <simonwide@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

three widelux is correct number. i trust that nobody unsubscribes
because of this serious error.

Joe McCary - wrote:

I remember reading about the guy who was to shoot the top of the Alps and
had  a Helicopter drop him off on a peak and was to then act as his "flag"
to block the sun.  BUT the wind picked up before the Helio could return and
he was forced to spend the night atop the peak with just the minimum of
clothing and no tent etc.  he was then picked up the next morning and was ok
but was a serious ordeal...

Joe McCary
-----Original Message-----
From: GAPiccagli@xxxxxxx <GAPiccagli@xxxxxxx>
To: panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: seitz roundshot 220 vr] schultress

In a message dated 1/11/00 8:17:41 AM, simonwide@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

<< good idea, phil, and is what emil schultress did years and years ago for
his famous 360 degree swiss alps poster...he had bracket and it held
four widelux cameras. stitching was nonexistant as we know it now. simon
nathan >>

Say, I think I remember an article on that, or was it in the Time?life photo
series? But I thought it was three cameras. True?

Giorgio Piccagli