Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Nikkor coverage

  • From: Willem-Jan Markerink <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Nikkor coverage
  • Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:59:31 +0100
On 14 Jan 00 at 12:43, Steven Morton wrote:

> "M. Denis Hill" wrote:
> > 
> > The camera is indeed appealing. In prior discussions on this topic, I
> > learned that some lenses for 35mm cameras cover substantially less image
> > area than Nikkors. As I recall, lenses as short as 24mm cover 120/220 film.
> > I'm not certain about Nikkor 20s, but my 18mm only covered about 45mm.
> 
> The 28mm and 35mm Nikkor PC lenses cover a 120 (56mm) slit
> Also the Olympus and Canon 24mm shift lenses

EOS does 58mm IIRC....:-))
(stopped down probably more (red area on both shift & tilt))

--                 
Bye,

Willem-Jan Markerink


      The desire to understand 
is sometimes far less intelligent than
     the inability to understand


<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]