Re: recent panorama-camera-prices

[Willem-Jan Markerink <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>]

On  1 Feb 00 at 23:36, Ellis Vener wrote:

> 
> > CharlesofSC@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > > Yes, but a Linhof is a Linhof, while a Fuji will always be a Fuji
> > >
> > > CharlesofSC
> 
> Once more:  A desperate attempt to prove one's superiority by claiming
> their equipment is better than somebody else's. The only thing that
> matters are the strengths of the images made, not the price tag,  not
> the sharpness of the lens, but the emotional strength of the images
> recorded. If a Fuji G617 costs $2000 less than a Linhof than that is
> $2000 more you have to spend on  travel, film and processing.  Sorry
> Charlie, good luck in your next incarnation, maybe you'll get "it" then.
> 
> Ellis
>

Can't remember the original poster asking about which one gives the 
best emotional strength.

Willem 
(mebbe you could advice him a 35mm SLR with panorama mask?....he 
could make a world tour from the savings!) 
Jan
 

--                 
Bye,

Willem-Jan Markerink


      The desire to understand 
is sometimes far less intelligent than
     the inability to understand


<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]