Re: Inverted Noblex?

[simon nathan <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

o.k., try this way. noblex
rising front, even limited, is needed lower so you upside down the camera.
it it not the same. regarding rising front on view camera it has the space
to move as the front standard permits, and  if lens delivers oversized 
coverage circle lens can be mounted off center to increase drop or rise.
simon nathan

James Romeo wrote:

I do not understand ???  N0 matter which whay you do it it is the same result. If you mont the Noblex upside down or lower the tripoid it is the same thing.You get more forground and less harizon. If I am using my view camera and I shift the lens or lower or rise the tripod again it is the same end. The reson for a shift is you do not need a ladder to see the ground glass or sit on the grood to look thoug the ground glass. So why is turing a camera upside down  better than lowering or rising my Noblex?                                        -----Original Message-----

From: panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Inverted Noblex?
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:10:36 -0700

-----Original Message-----
From: James Romeo

>For down shift why not just lower the tripoid my gitzo goes
>down to 15 in and I can spread the legs to the ground and
>even lower by taking off the center post and ......
>

Because if you keep the camera level then this method does nothing to shift
the horizon, only the foreground!

Garet Denise
garet@xxxxxxx