Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: fisheye or roundshot?
- From: Jook Leung <jook360@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: fisheye or roundshot?
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 23:43:11 -0400
To provide this discussion list with a visual example, I posted an image
taken with a Roundshot 220vr camera and a Sigma 15mm full frame fisheye
lens.
You'll notice that the base of the camera (the battery) is in focus while
everything further out is smeared.
I had no published info on where to set the rear nodal point "h value" for
this lens, so I used "a take a guess value" for the 14mm Sigma 2.8EX lens
but that's the rectilinear version.
http://360vr.com/pages/rs_fff_test.html
regards,
Jook
>On 15 Apr 00 at 13:49, Glenn Barry wrote:
>
>> The easy way to see this is to put the lens on look through the viewfinder
>> or ground glass and watch the degree of image distortion as you rotate the
>> camera. Fisheye mapping and compression requires that this is quite severe,
>> more so at the edges agreed, but it is present throughout the frame
>> including the centre. Just look at a straight line in the middle of the
>> frame. It must begin to curve the moment you rotate the lens due to the
>> fisheye projection. There will always be some blurring.
>
>It is claimed that only a single-pixel wide digital 'slit' can overcome
>this blurring problem....in that case, no pixel is exposed at more
>than one rotational position, unlike any photo-chemical registration
>with a meaningful slit-width (a slit would have to be smaller than a
>hair to mimick the digital one-pixel concept, which would kill the
>image due to diffraction (remember that the digital slit is not a
>slit, but only a recording single row of pixels, so diffraction is
>not relevant there).
>
>Not quite sure whether it is valid to explain the blur itself with
>the varying magnification of a fisheye....a rectangular lens has the
>same magnification from corner to center, a fisheye does not I
>believe (this even goes as far as the claim that a 14mm fisheye has
>less variety from corner to center than a 17mm fisheye with the same
>overall angle of view, hence the fisheye 'effekt' of the 17mm is
>larger).
>And since film speed of a rotating camera is depending on
>focal length, this is exactly the problem....no speed can suit both
>center and edge at the same time.
>
>--
>Bye,
>
>Willem-Jan Markerink
>
>
> The desire to understand
>is sometimes far less intelligent than
> the inability to understand
>
>
><w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
>[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
=============================================================
JOOK LEUNG
360VR Photography
44A Honeck Street
Englewood, NJ 07631
http://360vr.com voice: 201.894.5881 fax: 201.894.5882
http://bigapplepenthouse.com
|