Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

220VR focus



Hi Bill,
   Did you ever get your ground glass adjusted for your own vision? Was it
off much? Mine was off over 1.5 meters which played havoc with focus inside
rooms.
    Have you found any difference in focus when using a lens and changing
from one speed to another with the same lens on the camera?
My best,
George Pearl,
Atlanta Panorama

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Glickman" <bglick@xxxxxxxx>
To: <panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: 220VR NOTICE! IMPORTANT!


> Fabulous post... I will call you George, so we can discuss this...
>
> I would think the ground glass would always be positioned at the exact
same
> distance as the film is placed from the lens... so in theory, the film and
> the grain side of the gg would be seeing the exact same image?   Thats the
> way it works on LF cameras?
>
> Thank you for sharing....  It stops us all from trying to reinvent the
> wheel!
>
> Regards
> Bill
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "George S. Pearl" <alps007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 10:43 AM
> Subject: 220VR NOTICE! IMPORTANT!
>
>
> > Dear Bill & all 220VR users....
> >     let me share with you something that happened to me with my new
220VR
> > camera which sounds very similar to what you guys are yacking about! The
> > problem of sharpness from that camera is maybe not your lens at all, but
> > YOUR VIEWFINDER! It seems that Werner simply looks through the
viewfinder
> > and sets it to his own eyesight. So, unless you have the same vision as
> > Werner, you will need to adjust your viewfinder screen to be sharp with
> your
> > own eyes (not Werner's eyes).
> >    I wasted lots of film and time shooting and testing LENSES until I
> > figured out that it wasn't the lens that was the problem. After my
> adjusting
> > the viewing screen correctly, it was a whole new ball game! So there!
> > My best
> > George S. Pearl, BCQDE, BCEP, FEPIC, QPP
> > ALPS - Evidence & Photo
> > 2139 Liddell Drive, NE
> > Atlanta, GA 30324-4132
> >
> > Tel: 404/872-2577
> > National: 1-800-USE-ALPS
> > Fax: 404/872-0548
> > Home: 404/634-1139
> > Cell: 404/771-9121
> > ALPS Website: "http://www.ALPSLABS.com"
> > Atlanta Panorama is a division of ALPS...
> > "http://www.AtlantaPanorama.com"
> >
> >
> >
> > 4.  The test images I shot all appear soft on film.  I was a
disappointed
> > > > with the image quality.  It did not come close to what a MF camera
can
> > > > produce.  Do other people experience this also?  I was told by a few
> > users
> > > > that rotational cameras are not that sharp for the obvious reasons.
> Mr.
> > > > Seitz said a MF lens will never be as sharp on a rotational camera
vs.
> a
> > > > still camera?  I am wondering how much worse the image really gets.
> > Does
> > > > using smaller slits help?  Any input on this would be helpful...  I
> was
> > > > planning on big enlargements, and now am doubting the possibility of
> > doing
> > > > such
> >
>