RE: LS-2000 help

[Ernst Dinkla <ernst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In <URL:news:lokaal.panorama> on Tue 08 Aug, Sokolowski, Ed wrote:
> I have NEVER seen such a simple subject made SOOOOO complex. God bless you
> ....... What does all this have to do with Harold Wong's question? 
> What are you saying, REALLY. Are you saying that what I have said wont
> work??? Are you saying that you dont agree and there is another method that
> is better for the situation I was responding to.  What does all this stuff
> have to do with getting better scans on a LS-2000 scanner. Please enlighten
> me I dont understand. 
> The simple fact of the matter is that RGB and CMYK are totally different.
> One is additive color and one is subtractive. Dont you think a person
> starting out with all this should learn the basics color theory before he
> gets involved in all this nonsence. Or are you one of those guys that
> believe in all the hype that is assoated with most of the products that you
> mentioned and thinks that using them will somehow make everything better??? 

The relevant parts of your answer to Harold Wong may have helped him.
The parts that were wrong didn't help him. My first message was short
and to the point. I don't think Harold Wong works with a RIP or Quark so
he does a better job by keeping his images in RGB up to the point of
printing on an Epson. You were wondering why Epson uses an RGB to CMYK
driver, I'm sorry that my answer on that was too complex :-)

Ernst
-- 
Ernst Dinkla  Serigrafie,Zeefdruk            The point will never be metric