Re: 828 film and Haneel

["KENNETH LUKER" <KLUKER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I think the Haneel Tri-Vision used 828.   However, compared to a
> Realist, Revere, Kodak, Wirgin, TCD, etc., I wouldn't consider the
> Haneel TriVision a "real" stereo camera.  I haven't played with mine in
> a long time, but I think I remember a "ruby" window so you could see
> the numbers on the paper backing.  The "slide mounts" were transparent
> plastic pockets that you slipped the film chips into.

True, the Haneel uses 828.  I have a mint condition Haneel Tri Vision 
that has never been touched by a roll of film, as far as I can tell.  
I've never found 828 film for it, but I remember the film from my 
photo-processing days in the 'fifties.  There is indeed one sprocket 
hole per frame.  I believe the Haneel uses a staggered advance, 
whereby the user winds the film so that the numbers on the paper 
backing appear in a special sequence in the window(s) in the back of 
the camera.  I don't believe the sprockets have any function in this 
case.
KL 







_______________________________________________________________

Kenneth Luker, Assistant Director
Systems and Technical Services
Marriott Library
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah
KLUKER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


------------------------------